|
Significant amounts of waterbirds
die annually due to the ingestion of lead pellets used by
waterbird hunters. Countries worldwide are looking for ways
to avoid this - and an international waterbird agreement
is advocating a phase-out of lead shot for hunting in wetlands.
Now the message has to be spread.
The picture looks far from nice. It shows
an opened bird stomach on a dish, with the contents spilling
out. Among the half-digested plant materials lie a handful
of small round pellets. They are shot pellets, used by waterbird
hunters, and swallowed by the duck in question. "This is
unfortunately a common sight in waterbirds around the world",
says Dr. David Rodrigues, natural resources manager and
lecturer at the Escola Superior Argrária in Coimbra, Portugal.
Rodrigues, a conservationist at heart and also an avid hunter,
has organised a workshop at his institution to address the
problem of waterbirds being poisoned by ingesting lead pellets.
His aim is to convince Portuguese hunters to start using
alternative, non-toxic shot types, and to stimulate his
authorities to ban the use of lead shot in wetlands. "We
sampled large amounts of ducks in wetlands in Central Portugal
and came to some rather shocking conclusions", continues
Rodrigues. "In certain periods almost 60% of the birds we
examined had elevated levels of lead in their blood, and
more than 10% actually carried pellets in their stomach.
One bird had even ingested 99 pellets."
Death toll in the millions
Cartridges for hunting waterfowl each contain around 30
grams of lead. A hunter fires several cartridges for every
bagged bird. Only a few pellets actually hit the bird; the
rest fall to the ground or into the water. This is how thousands
of tonnes of lead end up in wetlands around the world -
each year. In France and Spain, the annual deposition is
estimated to exceed 5000 tonnes per year. For many countries,
including Portugal, the exact amount is unknown. However,
as a rule of thumb, the annual lead deposition per hunter
is somewhere between four and five kilograms. Waterbirds
have no teeth. In order to effectively digest their food,
they ingest grit or even pebbles, which remain in the muscular
stomach and help to grind the food. "Due to this habit,
waterbirds tend to purposely pick up lead pellets from the
wetland bottom", explains Rodrigues. "They mistake them
for grit. The acidic stomach fluids, combined with the grinding
of the stomach, cause the pellets to dissolve. This is how
lead enters the blood stream." He shows a video which offers
a disturbing sight: a duck that is staggering across a field,
swaying heavily back and forth, and collapsing every few
steps. After a minute or so, the bird sits down exhausted
and lays down its head in the grass. Lead is a highly poisonous
metal. It causes anaemia and affects the nervous and circulatory
systems, liver and kidneys. Birds that ingest ten or more
lead pellets will die of acute lead poisoning within a few
days. Even a smaller number will cause chronic lead poisoning,
shown by weak limbs, green diarrhea, weight loss and atypical
behaviour. Rodrigues: "This influences their ability to
forage, to escape from predators, to reproduce and to migrate.
These victims usually die within a few weeks." If a bird
swallows only one pellet, it usually survives, although
its immune system and fertility are likely to be affected.
Also, even low concentrations of lead cause irreversible
brain damage. All in all, millions of waterbirds are estimated
to die annually because of lead poisoning. Affected birds
are an easy prey for predators, such as raptors or foxes.
These, and also scavengers, run a high risk of accumulating
dangerous lead levels in their bodies. Around 15% of mortality
in adult eagles - bald eagles in North America, white-tailed
and imperial eagles in Europe - is contributed to what is
called secondary poisoning.
High-quality alternatives
The second speaker at the workshop is Niels Kanstrup, director
of the Danish Hunters' Association, and president of the
Miratory Bird Commission of the International Council for
Game and Wildlife Conservation. An animated speaker, Kanstrup
is providing the thirty or so participants with the more
optimistic side of the story. "The good news is that there
is an easy solution. You don't have to shoot with lead at
all. Today there are really good alternative types of shot.
The challenge is to convince hunters to start to use these."
One way of approaching this challenge is to impose a ban
on the use of lead shot. Seven countries - the USA, Canada,
Finland, Sweden, Denmark, Norway, The Netherlands and Switzerland
- have already done so. Many other countries have some legislation
in place, concerning either certain species, certain areas
or certain seasons. However, in the vast majority of countries,
lead is still being used on a large scale. International
legislation is provided by the African-Eurasian Waterbird
Agreement (AEWA), which aims to protect around 235 wetland
species, including ducks, geese and swans, but also cranes,
gulls, terns and even the South African Penguin. The AEWA
range stretches from Greenland to South Africa, and currently
49 countries have signed the agreement. These countries
thereby obliged themselves to adhere to AEWA's principles
and resolutions. One of these resolutions is to ban the
use of lead shot in wetlands. Portugal signed the agreement
in 2004, but, like many other countries, still has no lead
shot legislation in place. "The problem is that laws alone
just don't work", cautions Kanstrup. "Banning lead shot
is one thing, but if you don't get hunters to fundamentally
agree, they will not respect the legislation, they will
not be partners, and some may continue using lead anyway.
You need to invest in education and awareness raising. It
comes down to showing hunters the problem and its solutions,
and meeting them where they are. Otherwise the prejudices
against alternative types of shot will prevail." One of
these prejudices is that hunters would have to buy new guns
in order to use alternatives. Steel shot, the most common
alternative, is a lot harder than lead shot and is feared
to damage guns. Kanstrup: "This is hardly the case. Only
very old guns might pose some problems. But I have never
seen anyone getting hurt by a gun exploding in his face."
Learning how to shoot with steel shot does require some
time and effort, he readily admits. "But regardless of the
shot type, around 80% of the effectiveness of a shot is
determined by the hunter himself, not by the materials he
uses. Training is the key. Learning by doing is the only
way forward. Hunters will discover themselves that steel
performs just as well as lead."
Fundamental principles
Another problem that remains is the availability of steel
shot. It cannot be bought everywhere. Also, its price is
generally slightly higher than that of lead shot. This might
prove a decisive factor. "The legal framework provided by
AEWA might be a first step in the right direction", opines
Kanstrup. "Increasing demand will lower the price and improve
the availability of alternatives. This is what happened
very succesfully in Denmark. But again, awareness raising
is the key. Not just among hunters and policy makers, but
also among ammunition manufacturers." Here too, AEWA has
an important role to play. Its international network proves
a powerful tool to share knowledge and expertise. AEWA supports
research and monitoring, publishes information materials,
and organizes workshops for hunters and policy makers. Also
David Rodrigues' workshop was supported by AEWA. "We have
a long way to go", says Kanstrup after the meeting's closure,
"but workshops like this one are a very important first
step. A seed has been planted today." Rodrigues fully agrees:
"The key people were present, including the president of
the National Confederation of Portuguese Hunters and the
Director of the Portuguese Hunting Services. We seem to
have convinced these people that action is needed, and they
resolved to work on concrete actions for phasing out the
use of lead shot. And as for us, it remains our responsibility
to keep pressure on it." In the end, this will not only
benefit waterbirds and their habitat, but also hunters themselves.
After all, by protecting this natural resource they will
safeguard their own passion for the future. Kanstrup: "This
is our common goal. Wise use and sustainability are fundamental
principles of hunting."
Download article

|