|
Bonn,
23 May 2008 – The CMS-FAO Task Force on Avian
Influenza today organised an international seminar at the
Zoological Research Institute and Museum Alexander Koenig
during the UN Conference on Biodiversity. Participants heard
key lessons from an assessment of recent outbreaks of ‘bird
flu’ or avian influenza H5N1. These conclusions were
drawn from a world-wide assessment of responses to recent
outbreaks of H5N1.
CMS Executive Secretary Robert Hepworth
said: “The report stresses the wide range of actions
that need to be taken to halt the spread of this virus.
It is important that balanced national responses are undertaken
to address the wide range of mechanisms thorough which the
virus has spread. The meeting condemned the continued misguided
practice of actively killing wild birds and destroying their
nest sites and wetland habitats in response to, or in avoidance
of, infection within a country, which is contrary to the
recommendations of many international bodies. Such approaches
to the prevention or control of avian influenza are wasteful,
damaging to conservation and have no real scientific basis.
They may also exacerbate the problem by causing further
dispersion of infected birds“.
In order to respond effectively to the
spread of H5N1, it is critical that responses to the spread
of this disease are ‘ioined-up’, both internationally
(between countries), nationally (within governments), and
scientifically (between different scientific disciplines).
Central to effective responses is the close and integrated
working of the governmental and non-governmental sectors,
bringing together complementary expertise of epidemiologists,
veterinarians, virologists, biologists and ornithologists.
Guidance on how to respond to the continued spread of avian
influenza will be given in the document published by the
Scientific Task Force that will be tabled at the forthcoming
conferences of the African-Eurasian Waterbird Agreement
(AEWA)
and the Ramsar
Convention on Wetlands later this year, as
well as the CMS Conference of the Parties in Rome in December.
The workshop noted that different mechanisms
have been responsible for the spread of HPAI H5N1 at different
times and places. Experience has demonstrated the critical
need for epidemiological investigations following infection
to determine causes of infection. Such investigations help
government decision-makers restrict the further spread of
the virus through a better understanding of how the infection
spreads.
The development of an international surveillance and ‘early
warning system’ for HPAI is important. This should
aim to share data and information a between researchers
and decision makers.
Experience has highlighted the need to
develop contingency plans before infection arrives so as
to address the wide range of issues posed by HPAI outbreaks.
In particular, strategies for improved communication, education
and public awareness provide important building blocks to
assist and hopefully restrict future outbreaks of highly
pathogenic avian influenza.
A central conclusion is the continuing
need to further develop national capacities within government
and elsewhere to respond to the challenges posed by H5N1
HPAI — not only in responding to outbreaks, but also
preparing for these through contingency planning and risk
assessment.
Whilst much attention has been focused
on H5N1 HPAI, developing wildlife surveillance programmes
will assist in responding to the spread of other wildlife
diseases. The workshop stressed the need to take longer-term
and integrated perspectives in responding to the challenges
posed by these diseases.
The global response to HPAI H5N1 provides
an important opportunity to learn and to build capacity
for wildlife disease surveillance and habitat management
in order to reduce associated risks. This will assist in
controlling both novel and existing wildlife health problems
as well as reducing impacts on human populations through
the emergence and spread of diseases than can infect humans.
In the context of both the Convention on
Migratory Species (CMS)
and the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD),
the issues raised by wildlife diseases are cross-cutting.
They affect conservation of protected areas and conservation
policies such as breeding programmes associated with species
recovery projects.
Notes to Editors:
1. The Scientific Task Force on Avian Influenza
and Wild Birds was convened in 2005 to create a liaison
mechanism between those international organisations and
intergovernmental environmental agreements engaged in activities
related to the spread of H5N1 Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza
(HPAI). The Task Force also met a need for information on
wild birds to be better reflected in the debate about H5N1
HPAI and its spread around the world. It comprises representatives
and observers from 14 international organisations, including
7 UN bodies. UNEP/CMS and FAO act as joint chairs of the
Task Force.
2. The Task Force aims to collect and coordinate
the best scientific advice on the conservation impact of
the spread of HPAI H5N1, including assessing the role of
migratory birds as vectors of the virus. It aims to ensure
that national and international policies on HPAI H5N1 are
based on best available data and information. Its work has
been crucial to help develop collaborations and joint work
programmes, and has thus enhanced the effectiveness of responses.
2. An international workshop organised
by the Task Force took place in Aviemore, Scotland, from
26 to 28 June 2007 to address ‘Practical Lessons Learned’
in relation to the spread of Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza
(HPAI) H5N1 outbreaks. This brought together Task Force
members as well as national experts from around the world,
with experience of handling outbreaks with the aim of reviewing
practical issues arising, and lessons learnt, from recent
HPAI outbreaks.
3. The workshop provided a platform for
active debate and the sharing of information on practical
responses to avian influenza with a focus on reviewing recent
experiences of dealing with outbreaks. Guidelines on good
practice responses were collated to assist to those responsible
for responding to HPAI outbreaks, wildlife experts, and
managers of protected areas.
4. The conclusions of the workshop can
be found at:
http://www.aiweb.info/documents/Aviemore%20conclusions.pdf
5. The Convention on the Conservation of
Migratory Species of Wild Animals aims to conserve terrestrial,
marine and avian migratory species and their habitats throughout
their range. It is an intergovernmental treaty, concluded
under the aegis of UNEP, concerned with the conservation
of wildlife and habitats on a global scale. UNEP/CMS is
addressing all threats to the survival of migratory animals
and to the migration process itself such as light pollution,
climate change, by-catch, wind turbines, ship strikes, power
lines, as well as habitat degradation and loss. The Convention
was adopted in Bonn, Germany, on 23 June 1979 and entered
into force on 1 November 1983. Today, 108 countries are
Parties to the Convention.
Contact:
Ms Veronika Lenarz
UNEP/CMS Secretariat
Hermann-Ehlers-Str. 10
53113 Bonn, Germany
T. +49 228 815-2409
F. +49 228 815-2449
vlenarz@cms.int
www.cms.int
Press release can also be downlaoded here:
| Press
Release - English |
|
|
| Pressemitteilung
- Deutsch |
|
|
|